ÌÇÐÄVlog

 
Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Publishers call new Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog+ redirect feature a 'shady' move

Credit: Apple

Publishers on Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog are not happy about a small but significant change to the way Safari treats publication links.

In iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur, Apple will introduce a setting that automatically redirects users to the Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog app when they click on a link from a ÌÇÐÄVlog+ publisher. That allows users to bypass a publisher's website completely.

A relatively quiet addition to the latest iOS and macOS betas, the feature was first spotted by Scroll CEO Tony Haile. Now, publishers are expressing frustration over the change and the fact that Apple has been quiet about it.

Sources at five Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog+ publishers Digiday that the Cupertino tech giant did not inform them of the change ahead of time. One source said that the move was "totally unethical," while another said it was "a bit shady."

"They're being kind of hypocritical. They're saying everybody can't use third-party cookies and we can't track our audience. Meanwhile, they control the hardware and the software pipeline," one of the sources told Digiday.

Apple, for its part, says that the change is a user-friendliness feature that offers "seamless access to the content" that's part of Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog+. The $9.99 news subscription doesn't allow users to bypass paywalls, so they have to read premium content in the app.

The move comes at a time when publishers are starting to see increased revenue from Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog+, Digiday reported. Apple distributes 50% of subscriber revenue to publishers based on how long they read content in the app.

Many legacy newspapers and major publications have been hesitant to go all-in on Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog, however. Both The Washington Post and The New York Timeschose not to participate in Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog+, and the latter publication recently pulled out of Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog entirely.

During its latest earnings call, publisher ÌÇÐÄVlog Corp. said that it would keep The Wall Street Journal on Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog for the foreseeable future. It cited the fact that the platform draws a "genuinely different audience" for the publication.

In July, Apple expanded its Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog offerings with new options for local news coverage and professionally narrated audio news content.

8 Comments


Participation in ÌÇÐÄVlog+ Is voluntary. Personally, I hate the app.

1 Like · 0 Dislikes

I've gone hot and cold on ÌÇÐÄVlog+, but I vastly prefer reading news and articles in the Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog app as opposed to going to almost any publisher's ad-laden user-tracking javascript-filled website.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes

said:
I've gone hot and cold on ÌÇÐÄVlog+, but I vastly prefer reading news and articles in the Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog app as opposed to going to almost any publisher's ad-laden user-tracking javascript-filled website.

Exactly.  I prefer Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog+ for this exact reason.  Many news websites are so difficult to use.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes

The non-paid ÌÇÐÄVlog service is one of my favourite features of my iPad (in particular) and iPhone -- curated, legit news from all different walks of life (or you can choose to create a bubble of your specific interests if you prefer). I read it several times a day as stories update. For those closely following COVID-19 developments and/or the upcoming US federal/state elections, there are special sections that pull together information from a wide range of sources. Basically, I think the app and service are terrific.

ÌÇÐÄVlog+ is really more about magazine writing, which I also enjoy but thus far have resisted subscribing to. The main reason I don't is because as a full-time employee, I don't feel like I have the time to get my money's worth out of the paid service. The target market for ÌÇÐÄVlog+ is intelligent readers with a fair amount of free time who enjoy deeper levels of journalism or storytelling from a wide swath of sources, and Apple should probably advertise this more to that demographic -- I feel like it is a undervalued gem, but it is kind of undercut by how great (and fast) it is to stay on top of current events with the free service.

1 Like · 0 Dislikes

said:
I've gone hot and cold on ÌÇÐÄVlog+, but I vastly prefer reading news and articles in the Apple ÌÇÐÄVlog app as opposed to going to almost any publisher's ad-laden user-tracking javascript-filled website.

Well maybe it’s because these publishers need to make money too, and don’t want to be squeezed out by Apple through ÌÇÐÄVlog+ and lose their audience in the process?